Review index — separate legal statuses

Constitutional Revision Materials

Status: substantive revision proposal; not enacted or ratified. Public consultation materials are published from these sources.

• Constitutional Design Principles: non-operative public design guidance explaining the constitutional commitments used to assess the draft.\n- Constitutional draft: proposed constitutional rights and institutions; numbering remains provisional.
• Schedule A and Schedule B: proposed constitutional schedules.
• Organic Electoral Law and Organic Government Law: proposed implementing laws, not operative constitutional text.
• Proposed regulations: civil timekeeping, administrative/data standards, sacred sites, and currency.
• Founding Commentary: non-operative symbolic explanations; factual and linguistic claims require review.
• Legacy website preamble: preserved historical alternative, not the current constitutional preamble.
• Review matrix: authoritative status map separating settled constitutional rules, design principles, reserved matters, RFC/expert-review questions, delegated implementation, and publication/process work. The lowercase review-matrix.md is a stale legacy duplicate and is not authoritative.
• Requests for Comment: focused public and specialist consultation documents for unresolved constitutional design questions. RFCs are non-operative and do not make surrounding provisions final.
• Reserved questions: unresolved constitutional decisions and delegated implementation details.
• Disposition ledger, machine-readable JSON, and historical source: revision evidence, not competing current provisions.
• Legacy website variants: records the older preamble, superseded Borda rule, and omissions corrected by synchronization.
• Approved-requirements review: maps all sixteen instructions to the revision and identifies outstanding policy choices.

All relocated items state original source, status, disposition, legal type, relocation approval, and substantive status. Schedules are proposed constitutional components; commentary and proposals acquire no legal force by inclusion in this directory. The historical source intentionally retains obsolete wording to prevent silent loss.

Continuation supporting proposals: Judicial Institutions Law, Return and Restitution Law, and confidential reporting. The external package-level prior-pass archive preserves superseded review text; the continuation JSON records exact constitutional before/after changes.

Latest implementation proposals: Population Enumeration Law and Transition Implementation Plan framework. Historical duplicate snapshots are stored in the downloadable package’s review-archive, outside the repository overlay.