Participate
This project is at an early stage, and its structure is meant to grow rather than be fixed in advance. Right now, the most valuable way to get involved is direct engagement with the draft itself.
Read and respond
The draft is long and dense by necessity. Read the parts most relevant to your knowledge or your stake in this, and tell us what's wrong, missing, or naive. Section-level feedback is especially useful.
Bring expertise
Constitutional law, transitional justice, electoral systems, monetary policy, security sector reform, and more — specific critique is worth more than general reaction.
Review the Supporting Framework, then send feedback on the related constitutional section. Name the supporting proposal and provision in your comment.
Bring lived experience
If you're Jewish, Palestinian, or from one of the minority communities this draft is written for, your read on whether this reflects real needs and constraints matters most.
Share section-level feedback. Explain the practical need or experience you want reviewers to consider; the form offers optional perspective and experience fields.
Review what remains open
Browse the focused Requests for Comment, read the formal constitutional reservations, and review public deliberation. Each RFC has a targeted response link; questions, concerns, alternatives, and project responses remain part of the same review and privacy process.
Help with Arabic or Hebrew review
Professional constitutional translation, equivalence, and right-to-left review are still needed. Use the feedback form to identify the section, language, and translation issue, or describe the expertise you can bring. This is an initial contact pathway, not a translation editor.
Follow the work and manage contributions
Read Revision History for public changes. Sign in or create a contributor account using an email link to manage your contributions. An account is optional for section-level feedback; guest submissions use the existing receipt workflow.
On governance
This project does not yet have a formal structure for shared decision-making, and we don't think it should invent one prematurely. For now, all feedback is gathered, reviewed, and incorporated through an informal, ongoing process.
As genuine collaboration takes shape, our intention is to establish a more formal structure, likely some form of editorial or governing committee, and for the details of that structure to be decided collectively by the people who've earned a role in it, not imposed by one person just because they made the first contribution.
If and when that transition happens, it will be documented here.